Re: Some Gold reading
in response to
by
posted on
Apr 22, 2010 03:10PM
"If you have short positions and paper gold to the extent that you have right now, the whole situation is distorted. The fact is, and I think there has been some really good work done on this recently, I mean there is so many paper claims on each good delivery bar, that if everyone decided one day that they didn't want their paper gold, they wanted the gold that was supposedly underlying it and they demanded it. It would just blow the top off the market and I think, before this is over, that will occur."
Once I got to this paragraph I couldn't believe him anymore. This guy's either purposefully lying, or doesn't know how futures contracts work. The "paper" in question is a futures contract, which is supposed to get settled in cash - most brokers aren't even set up to let you take physical delivery of "paper" gold, or any other "paper" commodity for that matter.
It never gets delivered, and that's the entire point of futures. In the language of the tinfoil-hatters, paper gold is "fiat" gold. :-)
As well, people who buy the futures are "leveraged" typically 10-1, so they could never pay for the gold if they did demand delivery.
This article sums up all the tinfoil-hat problems with the whole GATA argument:
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/townsend/2010/0419.html
Executive summary: