"that based on something a lawyer has said, you are all ready to throw out what we do know and take a big chance on something we don't know....something that has the potential to real bad...massive dilution..."

No, what I've said about Peter has nothing to do with "what a lawyer said" and everything to do with his abhorrent track record. It is all based on fact. That's why I assumed you are new to this stock...because you clearly don't have a clue about Peter's history. Case in point: you're worried about the new board creating "massive dilution." You've got to be kidding me! Dilution is Peter's forte! You have the nerve to claim you know about this company and in the same breath demonstrate how clueless you are about it.

How about this: come up with a realistic scenario whereby the new board manages to get the sp lower than it already is. Seriously! Are you telling me they'll bring it down to 10 cents? 5 cents? They couldn't be worse than Peter if they tried!