Johnny, Brad wrote a great rebuttal to post. However, I feel like I need to add to it because your post, has 2 very serious implications suggested in it:

A-Our grade of gold is lower than what has been reported

B-The company is purposefully hiding bad results and has an ethical issue.

For the record, I think these two implications are absolutely false and have no basis in reality and I am staking my reputation on it!

Now, anyone who believes those implications would not be invested in Golden Hope, yet here you are telling us that you have taken a modest equity position in GNH. I have been thru your history and find you a credible poster from past posts on Noront but that is the only other company that you have ever posted on. I hope you can understand the optics of your situation here and those optics are not very good. However, you have raised points that do need to be addressed. Personally, I would love to have JT come on here and explain the results to you as this would prove to everyone how not only is he a man of the highest ethical standards but also a man with a very intelligent understanding of not only geology but also statistic analysis.

If you are serious about your investment in Golden Hope, my suggestion is for you to call Sasha Monday morning and ask to have a phone interview with James Tilsley. Now, he is a very busy man whose skills and time are better served working on our project. However, the points you raise publicly on this forum attack our company in a very serious way and I believe you owe it to yourself as an investor and to this community to get the facts and report them back here.

Brad already commented on the conservatism of JT and the techniques that were used to do the bulk sampling. I do not want to repeat it. However, I would like to add that in the bulk samples results we also have some very high grade areas and those were not highlighted as much as they could of IMO. This again goes to credibility and conservative nature of JT.

The 3rd bulk sample (from memory here, my kids are now up and want pancakes so got to cut this short) had results of 18g/t from the original authors. JT went over the results and restated the results as 11g/t . If the company was not ethical, they would of hidden this result.

Sorry to cut this short but daddy duty calls,

Glorieux