hzmn91, I don't disagree with you, quite the opposite. I think that JT doesn't need to send in those results to prove his theory in regards to a very large, low grade gold body. I still hang on to the 100 million tons at a min. 2 g/ton as a HUGE catalyst for this stock. I have been told over and over again that the company WILL achieve this in the not too distant future. Now, I will give credit where credit is due and give JT all the room he needs to do what he has to to prove up our grade in whatever way he will do this. I think he will be justified in the end whichever way he proves this out. It is the END results that I am looking for, a year or two down the road.

Do we have enough tonnage at, what did Frank C call it, ECONOMICAL grade to sell our very large claims to a Major gold company to make us a comfortable profit over this time frame? That is what I am counting on and where I have placed my money. I can sit and watch the share price do it's thing, and those who trade, good on you. I am invested and can't wait until next spring to see where we are at... That is the time when I would like to smile :-} and see where I am at. Next spring will be a tell tale for me. If we are indeed proving up our tonnage and showing the world how many ounces we have, and if that number is above 5 million ounces, then I will be smiling for a long time...

Herb :-}