well thanks for posting the transcript of this very un-informed person:

the transcript shows his statements are false; the best example is that we have indeed done a bulk sample: (cook insinuates we have not)

yes, and indeed contrary to cook's false statement about a problem sampling: we have had no problem sampling our resource ...in fact, thus far, our grade is prooven at 3 grams per ton from a bulk sample.

(BNN should be more responsible.)

anyhow, thank you mr. twilight for bringing these obvious misconceptions as falsely broadcasted in ignorance by this cook fellow.

lastly he may have a following ....and yes many analists have followers:

example: i wonder how those investors ended up feeling when following the self-serving analists who suggested the public buy tech stocks on the Nasdaq when it was overvalued at 5000 points??? .... this was ten years ago, and today the nasdaq is only half that! (at the time in 1999-2000, CNBC should have been more responsible)

cheers to all longs ....danny

ps.

• Goldex was bought out not long ago>
• they have the same nuggety deposit type as GNH
• they had well under the grade at buy-out time ...1-2 grams
• now, after production start they see that 1-2 grams turn into 5 grams !!!
• this is what historically happens with nugget deposits.
• they had only 20 million tons verified

i wonder what cook would comment when confrnoted with these facts.

the profile thus far at GNH is 100 million tons, based on drilling and 1000 m. and this profile, although not verified is projected by several gelogists thus far.

again cheers ...and see you at somewhere between 10 and 100 dollars in the next 2-5 years. ....danny