money75....

"Did anyone notice this statement on page 12

New discoveries resulting in a NEW 20km (12.4 mi) mineralized belt in Southeastern Quebec, Canada.

Must have hit mineralization at Laval's Mountain?"

I took this as referring to what they have been working on, and just stating that they feel that GNH has discovered a 20 klm. belt in Southeastern Quebec. I don't see how they could be referring to Laval's Mnt. yet.

What I do wonder about tho', is if they are stating this, just using all the publicly released information, and none of the yet to be released results, or are they basing that on NEW info they have yet to release?

This other statement.......

• Drilling success may confirm the existence of an extensive belt (20+ km/12.4mi) which may result in the most significant mineralized gold (Au) area in recent Canadian history.

.......says something a little different, with a couple 'maybe's'. Here it says that drilling results....I'm assuming he's referring to the yet to be released assay results, or maybe Laval Mtn.'s drill results......MAY confirm the existence of an extensive ( wide and deep? ) with mineralized gold?

Maybe I'll e-mail Sasha and ask him to clarify this.

Pender

One statement seems to say there is a belt, and the other seems to say there may be one.

Is the second one just saying that