Re: Patriot Scientific Corporation v. Russell Fish --
in response to
by
posted on
Jan 16, 2007 03:05PM
"Amazing how dotOB and teremoto declare the 10q a disaster without being able to mention specific items in the report that make it a disaster. Yes, dot, everyone's entitled to an opinion. Too bad you couldn't back up your opinion with any logical thought process or facts.
Facts are the Fish litigation is settled in principle. It appalls me that they are walking away with $6.3 million when they were entitled to nothing. But that again seems to be a screwup by Beattie & Osborn, the result of a poorly written contract. At least it's settled. Uncertainty removed, which should please some of the posters here. At least until they find something else to whine about."
Fut,
You shift the blame to B&O and then the result of a poorly written contract. Who is to blame for settling with B&O? Who is to blame for the poorly written contract? The current BOD is the same BOD who had to approve settling with B&O and the poorly written contract. Are we supposed to settle with anyone with a claim coming after us?
Yes I'm glad the fish case is out of our hair and the uncertainty is removed but at what price.