"Maybe Swartz will sell, but conditionally - only at prices above .50."

Naw, couldn't be that simple. There must be a conspiracy somewhere. Or a big accumulator who has found that magic loophole in the SEC reporting requirements. Or a future licensee buying up the Swartz shares (I love that one. No insider trading there. Let's risk a penalty twice or three times the amount we can make on our invesmtent, risk losing our job, possible jailtime - but we know these guys never get caught, right?)

"Could be that after he's done, the SP will dive,"

Not sure where that's coming from - a big seller stops selling and the sp goes lower? Seems it should be just the opposite.

All this mental masturbation about accumulators and conspiracies and yada yada yada. Ron said it all - why would someone accumulate and accept that huge risk with the Markman ruling just around the corner, when the one insider that's been around and knows everything (Swartz) is doing just the opposite and mitigating his risk. Nobody, let me emphasize NOBODY knows how the Markman will come out - not even the super-confident Leckrones. If we get a positive Markman result there should still be plenty of time to accumulate. The sp isn't going to go to $3 overnight. Well, I hope it does, but I don't think it will.