TPL TTC do not want to take this all the way thru court as well.. and have the '336 determination wrt Obviousness.

I firmly believe that their(TPL/Moore) response to the USPTO has more than covered any assumed obviousness(there isn't any) and humbly suggest that the Defendants also arrived at this conclusion after reading the submission. To have continued to trial after this would have made proof of wilfull infringement a "no-brainer".  Might this be the "just cause" for the stay?

Be well