Whoa, Deb. You posted -

"and the 148 do PROVE that the J's ARE in fact Infringing on these patents AND that is the only interpretation that will be allowed in front of a Jury IF and that's a Big Big IF............"

I think you've taken a huge leap of faith here and made a big assumption. Unless you've had more than a couple patent attorneys look at ALL the facts of this case and then told you the above, I think it's a good time to back off of this statement.