I humbly suggest that you quit before it's too late.

You say that you agree that the parties have "entered into a business resolution of their legal dispute", which you later term a "settlement", then state that it does not mean that the defendants have validated the MMP Portfolio or admit to the validity of the patents

Please explain how there can be a settlement that does not admit validity of the patents when the PR clearly states:

The terms of their settlement include the grant by the TPL Group of rights under the Moore Microprocessor Patent Portfolio to Toshiba, Matsushita and JVC and their respective subsidiaries.

Rights to something that the Defendants believe invalid?

Be well