Please explain the connection you see between what is posted on a message board as theory about settlement terms and breaches of the confidentiality agreement.

IMO, without a DIRECT tie between the information being discussed and a disclosure by one of the parties in the agreement, I can see no way that the Court could hold any of the parties responsible. Are you implying they could? or are you saying that could be a source of one of the parties TRYING to piece together a trail that leads back to one of the other parties in the agreement?

Think about it, because, what is good for the goose, is good for the gander. TPL/PTSC could easily attribute these discussions to a disclosure by Matsushita as Mastushita could to TPL/PTSC and it would essentially be a he-said-she-said proposition. It sounds essentially like a fishing expedition that I would think the Court would scarcely even consider entertaining without solid PROOF that your "delusion" was directly attributable to information disclosed by one of the parties to the settlement.