I must say that I agree with
posted on
May 28, 2008 04:39PM
ronran's post, as I too spoke to the company and was told much the same thing.
I'm sure if you sent emails and called often enough, you would get through
too.
I was asked, "which part of FULLY reflects all Transactions"
is NOT understood? lol After I kept saying over and over, "you mean there is
really No more money coming?
And, for all the reasons ronran listed too which "do" make sense. Bummer as it may be.
You never know which way a jury will go.
Think about it, the PTO agreed that the Prior Art citings by
the defendents/Pubpat had enough "teeth" to give it a look see. Yes,
I know they say YES to reexams like 90+ % of the time so this was NO
surpries to US, but how could this SO called prior art be SPUN before a
Jury.
I have NO idea of how Roger Cook et al would do (even though I "believe"
what we have is the Real Deal) in front of a Jury. The lawyers for the
defense are no dummies and they can get there digs of doubt thrown in
here and there and get a jury wondering (I'm sure)!! Just listen to the tape
that Wolf supplied from someone annonymous. Still love Roger Cook though. lol
Anyway, onward and upward. I liked the Dutton report (for once)
And it would be NICE to see the Annual Report reflecting something about the
Annuity we receive every year (a la Dutton) and list what this annuity paid for:
2006 2007 2008 with PROJECTIONS for 2009 and 2010
That would be a VERY nice start.
I think even my broker would consider this a Big improvment. We need
guidance Please, PTSC.
We've got 3 years of Big Bucks coming in from our Annuity. Is this an annuity
that will continue to pay us through the year 2015?
Even if we could see a 2 year OUT projection, it would do wonders for our S/P. IMO
We have to have a compelling story. We're so close. Wishing all of us and PTSC
the Best Luck.
D and D