maybe if you would stop defending every statement regarding the BOD things would calm down a bit

If defending my investment involves countering allegations which range from the understandable through to outright libel of the BoD then I will. I have already questioned the continuing need for Johnson to remain on the board if S&L no longer have significant interests in PTSC; asked what's the point in replacing one "finance expert", Felcyn, with another, as required by the SEC; and Falk if a better candidate can be found in the field of medicine.

I have not included Schrock or Tredennick because I haven't seen any expressions of displeasure directed at them individually, other than them being tarred by the same accusations against the BoD.

If, as claimed, the purpose of discussion of all things PTSC is to also guide the decisions of potential new investors I fail to see how the constant negativity will achieve this aim. To paraphrase the thoughts of many: One look on here and they'd run a mile.

Without new investors taking up a greater percentage of the OS, the price starts to slide and impacts on my investment. I fail to see how the constant bashing achieves anything for longs and the only benefit would appear be for those taking advantage of the swings in price.

(I hope you don't see this reply as you being on my bad side - smiley)

.

.

Be well