"But you never know, maybe, one day, he'll think it's worth explaining the contradiction of not being permitted to say what he wasn't allowed to know in the first place."

What's the purpose of the sealed MOU from the J3 settlement? Are you sure it's anything that really impacts anyone? Are you positive that if it only protected Toshiba's interests, that PTSC shouldn't then be able to discuss it freely? Why if RG had nothing to do with the settlement, or according to SGE back then, didn't even know what it contained, would he be prohibited from talking about it? Yet not a word from you guys complaining about it. Even Turley's Patent Troll headline, barely had a comment from the same group.

Your questions to Brian are essentially vindictive, childish and not relevant. Brian didn't run PTSC. He was critical and supportive of the BOD in varying degrees on various issues before, during and after his tenure as member of the ADVISORY board. When you review his posting history, you see consistency from him, yet you don't see much of his philosophy or recommendations adopted by the company then or even now, but you see a wallowing pps. You criticize him for informatoin that the Company issued, and that he has refuted. You connote images of regular face to face intimate back and forth trading and interaction between Brian and the company as though he was there and responsible for formulating strategy and executing it, when there is nothing that Brian has said or that the company has said that would even suggest that type of relationship.

Basically, it appears as though many here are jealous that he was asked to be a member of an advisory board that PTSC obviously didn't take much advice from. And even if they did, you blame Brian for their poor execution rather than those responsible for the execution.

It's really quite laughable. Meanwhile, PTSC drags the bottom, and squanders YOUR resources left and right while you guys throw infantile attacks at a shareholder. Even the latest actions may be too little too late even if they are strategically positive, which I have doubts about.

It's funny, the Agoracom board has seemed to deteriorate over the last few years, yet I don't see any of the main Brian antagonists having given up their roles as Hub Leaders. Even you, who temporarily gave up your alias, have taken it back, but not because there has been an improvement here that you have helped achieve, and actually in the face of the contrary. Surely you each don't feel that you have been effective in improving the board's atmosphere, yet YOU REMAIN AS HUB LEADERS! Out of the other side of your mouths, you ridicule Brian because he didn't resign on your percieved required schedule, and that he lived up to his legal obligations. Comical AND hypocritical, to say the least.