Once again, thank you for your input. At the risk of repeating myself (which I often do),

I went back to Moore's complaint in which he first addresses his original ComAg with TPL. Then he talks about how in 2005 another ComAg was created. Under this 3 party ComAg, TPL assumed full licensing for the entirety of the MMP (including the MMP portfolio it had previously been licensing under the original ComAg)

If the original ComAg (between TPL and Moore) is now included in the 3 party ComAG (TPL/Moore/PTSC) and if Moore is successful in having his ComAg and amendments declared void/rescinded, wouldn't that in effect do the same for the 3 party ComAg and also the Master Agreement?