IMO, we are much closer to agreement than you may think. Nowhere do I suggest that anyone be anything but honest in their discussion of PTSC. But this includes being honest with oneself (this is not directed at you). Just moments ago I removed a post suggesting that there are zero positives for PTSC. Really? And that person presumeably still owns shares? Why? Was that person truly being honest in their post?

Perhaps still more clarification of my earlier post is necessary.

As I've stated repeatedly, I don't care what anyone posts about PTSC as long as there is some reasonable basis (and that basis can be pretty "loose"). I don't care if it is positive or negative, factual or speculative, as long as it is on topic and is informative or prompts thought/discussion. What I have a severe problem with is seeing the same message repeated endlessly. Here, such redundancy has historically been clearly skewed to the negative.

The redundancy issue is part of what's behind my suggestion of a Positives/Negatives Summary (or will some insist it be called the Negatives/Positives Summary? LOL). Say it there in very brief terms. It's said, and it's readily available to all. No need to re-debate every single issue. If something changes (new info or whatever), revisit and perhaps adjust the Summary accordingly. Hopefully all "attitudes" could be effectively represented from all sides, and it can be placed on the table for consumption.

I have my doubts as to whether such a Summary could be developed and agreed, but I do see it as a way to make this forum more effective, particularly for prospective investors who, based on history, would otherwise spend a little time here only to run away with their investment dollars. While they may still run away based on reading the Summary and doing other more customary DD, at least they might have a better feeling for existing investor sentiment - which is exactly why people visit message boards as a portion of their DD. After all, if you think about it, virtually all of us visit here as part of our ongoing DD.

FWIW,

SGE