I've always received answers to my emails from PTSC in the last six years - maybe it's you or our attitude which is the problem.

If LL did have a group and was trying to ascertain more power over the company I would welcome this. So if a shareholder is critical of the decisions that the BOD has made and voices this through an e-mail would this now be considered a bad attitude? How is asking a simple question attacking SGE1? I used to give deference to the BOD but after the last two years how can anyone still beleive in them!