I'm not complaining, just trying to understand / clarify why in one post you said there's no partnership, or language to that effect was misleading when in fact PTSC has always maintained the partner status with TPL. Now you say you agree. lol

As usual, the point that brings consternation to posters is this inconsistent, incomplete, and insufficient communication from PTSC. They say they've made up with their partner, settled their differences, and are ready to move forward with the business of the MMP. Tell shareholders nothing more, and then not long afterward go and remove their business partner from the partner section of their website. If you can't appreciate that that creates confusion, and questions from uneasy shareholders of a company with a LONG HISTORY of screw-ups, then you may be as tone deaf as the company itself.

My belief is more along the lines of what Ron has posted. This is just another example of the company pulling away from shareholders. On the positive note, they've updated their website info to be more accurate, however, to do so, they've simply eliminated all old innacurate info, without making any attempt to provide updated new info that provides better visibility into what they are doing now. Hopefully it's a first step, but without a second step towards the better visibility, it's a lame and empty effort, IMO.