I wonder if the USPTO screwed up on purpose? The reason I say that is because they purposely included some land mines in the 749 NIRC document. An issue which Henneman brought to their attention, but whose communication is not being made public nor corrections made to the NIRC.

How convenient for ARM.

I'll try to bring this to PTSC's attention on Monday.

I am certain TPL has everything in order for asserting the MMP patents. I am also certain no mistakes were made on purpose. TPL and PTSC lawyers review all patents prior to them being published. Reexaminations do not happen in a vacuum. TPL and PTSC were involved in every step throughout the reexamination process. If we have the law on our side and capable lawyers, conspiracies do not happen. Normally people dream up conspiracies when the facts don't fit the interpretation they want.

Weren't several claims added to the 584 to further define claim 29? Also, I have found that the USPTO is slow in updating patents within the official system.

The USPTO is backlogged. They couldn't care less about which patent they are reviewing. To them it is a backlog that needs to be processed and moved forward. I have personal experience interacting with the PTO and have followed first hand the prosecution of a patent through out the prosecution life cycle. There is absolutely no conspiracy and I am amazed these issues even arise at this stage of the investment.