"The more I think about it, the more I wonder if there's some synergies that could be gained with a group of shareholders reaching out to Moore and whether he would be interested in launching a battle to remove the current BoD and replacing them with pro-shareholder/Moore representatives."

While I applaud the sentiment, if a legal vote by PTSC of 4-to-1 in favor of changing to Majority voting couldn't replace them, we're pretty much left with a sudden epidemic of consicence, an Act of God or death to break the deadlock.

Or some criminal conviction or similar event which would prevent them serving on a board.

If only one were to drop off, the remaining two would just look at their "Which buddy's next?" list and vote him or her in.

I think it is two stage - first somehow break the shell protecting the incumbents, then talk to Chuck. After what the current BOD apparently did to Chuck (read his blog) I can't see him cosying up to the current triad.

Maybe enough complaints to the SEC and/or to the California Attorney might shake something loose. Or some way of sub-poenaing (?) PTSC files.