Re: This particular motion might be telling ... Ghost
in response to
by
posted on
May 15, 2013 12:55PM
I do not believe we lost this one.
<wherein said central processing unit operates asynchronously to said input/output interface </>11, 13, 16</> Respondents
The way I read our arugument, independent includes not derived from
<Thus, it is clear from the specification and the file history that the concept of “not derived from” is a part of independence. By providing clocks for the CPU and the I/O interface that are independent of each other (including the fact that they are not derived from each other), the CPU and the I/O interface will operate asynchronously with respect to each other.>
Our argument is that inclusion is duplicative. Not needed.
IMO,
Opty