Re: showing 20-25 milion from Apple..? .. The question becomes/ Biajj
in response to
by
posted on
Nov 20, 2013 02:36PM
"What will folks do differently if they are provided proof that Apple paid over $26,000,000 to TPL, and less than 20% of it, or $5.2 Mil went towards the MMP; which amount we then had to split with TPL ?"
1. Please post a link to prove this is what happened.
"Less than 20% also qualifies as being the $960,000 license fee amount that we testified under oath that Apple paid for the MMP during the HTC trial."
2. Please post a link that this testimony took place.
"Will you create a sizable fund to hire a Shareholder representative then ?"
3. You were our Shareholders Rep. How much did you get paid and what did you do for us?
"Will you hire a lawyer to make a formal demand that PTSC use the BK court to squeeze a greater share of MMP patent assets from TPL ?"
4. How could an attorney demand anything when it is not PTSC that going BK?
"Will you formally demand through counsel that a patent professional fill the 3rd PDS seat as it's President; as is called for in the JV Agreement ? "
5. At the time you were our Shareholders Rep, did you demand this from Mr. Pohl and our BoD?
With all due respect, I am not a cricket, I do not keep silent or make excuses for them. You could have done a lot for us (Shareholders) when you had the chance. Why were you silent? TIA Just a thought. GLTAL's and new investors.