Re: MTX hits massive sulphide in JBL
in response to
by
posted on
May 22, 2008 01:19PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Geoprof- it appears you are raining on our parade when you say "I hope that the pyrite was not identified correctly, but ...."
Is it easy to misidentify iron pyrite? It seems both volcanic associated massive sulphides (VMS) and magmatic massive sulphides (MMS) both contain pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite but only VMS deposits contain pyrites. Knowing the signifigance of the pyrites wouldn't the geologist have been very careful in his wording? Could the VMS deposit still be a good source for Copper and Zinc?
The MTX press release said: "Significant amounts of pyrrohotite, pyrite and chalcopyrite have been visually identified by Brian Polk within the massive sulphides."