Re: Good point JD... dony
in response to
by
posted on
May 27, 2008 01:01PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Thanks Benton but I do know what it means.
"Whenever the term "massive" is utilized as a descriptive term in core please take note. That term means "great"...Don
Whenever the term "massive" is utilized as a descriptive term in core please take note. That term means VERY LARGE so when you see this take note. Pay close attention. It doesn't mean we hit anything. It just means we probably hit something. Is that better? Or would you like me to change it more for you? Was there anything in the chrome numbers that would indicate that there is more than a 90% chance that we will find more?
Thats funny. Getting picky over a term that means what I suggested it means. Huge, Great, Humungous.
I also said when you see that term take note!...I will say what was told to me by a real geo. "When you see the term Massive take note"...... John D has informed us that not all sulfides hold mineral. You said:
it does not mean "great", but rather refers to the intensity or continuity of the sulphide minerlizationRespectfull of course
you made a mistake. It should be intensity and continuity. You see MASSIVE is pretty well top. Right below that is SEMI MASSIVE. We have some of that as well...
respectfully of course
Don