So what is your point? We have already gone over this. You two want to continue this silly word game?

The whole board knows what it means. Just click on John's name and read his posts. You guys keep harping on what they are not.

I will repeat my message to this forum. When you see the term massive take note. Now get off my back unless you can post some geo info that means something.

You guys sit all day while everyone is waiting for explanations or some clarity. If it wasn't for John this board might still be in the dark. Then you guys come on when things have quieted down and attack me about one term. A term with which I am right. What gives?

One more thing. Sulfides that are barren have no mineralization. Well what else does barren mean? Give me a break you guys.

Correct yourselves before you attempt to correct me.

Post some info for the board that is useful to the members.

Let me ask one of you a question then. If the term 'massive" is not there does it not mean that the sulfides are not massive? Is this not a good sign if it says massive? You guys trying to tell me that it means nothing? No, no, no.

Now if it says massive barren sulfides there is no mineral content. Thanks again...Don