Re: One Simple Question was $3.55 the Bottom? * /Old Joe

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Old Joe

Rank: Treasurer [?]

Points: 11584 [?]

Votes: 409 Score: 2.9 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: One Simple Question was $3.55 the Bottom? * /Old Joe

in response to

Re: One Simple Question was $3.55 the Bottom? * /Old Joe

Sum4All

posted on May 31, 2008 03:26PM

No!

But your post on trading did open up a chance to state as I did. The whining is one thing. It reflects childish behavoiur and contempt for sensible minded Investors. Must be originating on Bay Street!

But there also seems to be a real effort afoot also to make many entheuastic posters appear incredable. Must be that the childish ones are feeling the heat from their OWNERS to do something about the truely good and effective posters we have the benefit of having around here. The OWNRES must be wondering why they can only employ FAILURE. Why can they NOT accass bashers of any form of quality? Says much to me about their character over and above their rather poor skill and abilities as managers of large Funds.