HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: A question for the forum. -Polylabel-Bulk Sample Size
1
Aug 23, 2008 05:32PM
2
Aug 23, 2008 07:46PM
26
Aug 23, 2008 08:24PM
10
Aug 24, 2008 04:42AM
3
Aug 24, 2008 04:54AM
8
Aug 24, 2008 05:05AM
2
Aug 24, 2008 05:45AM
3
Aug 24, 2008 06:35AM
3
Aug 24, 2008 07:05AM
2
Aug 24, 2008 10:43AM
5
Aug 24, 2008 10:51AM

Your posting is excellent and until Noront come out and say what their intentions are it's as good a baseline as any. 50,000 tonnes split between 3 zones (love to see 25,000 tonnes bulk out of each zone) should generate some interest if grade is halfway decent.

There are some sweet spots in those zones so grade, even with the barren rock that alway goes with good stuff, should be high.

Assay results for core samples was fantastic but tough to mill tonnage anywhere close to assay on narrow core. Does anyone have an example of mill results from mining where high grade core indicate high grade? My only experiance was with VCG many years ago and mill results was way lower than what the core assay might lead one to expect.

6
Aug 24, 2008 10:17PM
23
Aug 25, 2008 03:54AM

Aug 25, 2008 04:24AM
5
Aug 25, 2008 04:31AM
1
Aug 25, 2008 05:23AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply