HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: A question for the forum. -Polylabel-Bulk Sample Size-Polylabel
1
Aug 23, 2008 05:32PM
2
Aug 23, 2008 07:46PM
26
Aug 23, 2008 08:24PM
10
Aug 24, 2008 04:42AM
3
Aug 24, 2008 04:54AM
8
Aug 24, 2008 05:05AM
2
Aug 24, 2008 05:45AM
3
Aug 24, 2008 06:35AM
3
Aug 24, 2008 07:05AM
2
Aug 24, 2008 10:43AM
5
Aug 24, 2008 10:51AM

In any situation where visible gold (VG) is noted in core, only a sample size of considerable weight can provide a "reasonable" estimate of the grade to be expected from mining. The size of the bulk sample necessary can be estimated by a combination of the grain size distribution of the native gold particles and the statistical distribution of the gold assays from the core. There are numerous papers which one can review for the analytical process.

Whatever, the larger the bulk sample, the better the accuracy and precision of grades to be expected as this is the next best thing to actually mining the ore.

Hope this helps. I have personally been through this exercise several times.

Best regards

geoprof

6
Aug 24, 2008 10:17PM
23
Aug 25, 2008 03:54AM

Aug 25, 2008 04:24AM
5
Aug 25, 2008 04:31AM
1
Aug 25, 2008 05:23AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply