Re: Why don't we issue the PP to retail? Turn about is fairplay.
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 24, 2008 06:41PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
CW; I know we have discussed the idea of a rights offering by PM, and I agree that "IF" we have to do a PP, it should be a rights offering. I qualify that "IF" with reservations. We had better hope that we don't have to do any PP in the near term. When that "IF" becomes a maybe or even a probable, we better hope that we have hit a big hole and the market is on a definate upswing. To even think of a PP at this time would be ludicrous. We are, along with most of the mineral exploration market, in a survival mode at this time. While I agree that NOT is probably the pick of the litter, I wouldn't want to be trying to go to the market for a bit yet. Hell, most of us are having to stroll the hiways looking for cans, in order not to have to sell what we have, let alone take part in a rights offering.
This will change though, my friend, and hopefully soon.
Regards
K