Why don't we let Agoracom decide which of the hub leaders remain based on the exercise of responsibilities rather than volume of posts. For instance if in a month (or some other time frame) only the members that have exercised an action available to them showing they have demonstrated their interest in being a hub leader will remain on the list along with the members that have stated an interest. The maximum can be six. I myself am not interested, I have trouble enough reading all the posts. Lar certainly has my approval if required, I respect his posts and his objectivity displayed. Otherwise, there should be a vote and those interested should put their names forward. This can be complicated and time consuming if you have to vote for six.