Re: What next? ( From_Sudbury re WINDFALL)...
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 23, 2009 08:50PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
From_Sudbury,
You wrote "Wes, give us the assay results from Windfall. We have a right to know. Please"
I felt the same way, and wrote an e-mail to IR. It looks like Windfall is over for us...See the following email correspondence. :-(
Jacki
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hi Jackie. Hope all is well.
Hi JoanneIR may not read the Agoracom Board, so I'm sending you a copy of a post I made today re Windfall.Could you or Wes comment on the promised July report on Windfall? Shareholders would like to know details.Thanks,JackiCOPYTransparency...
posted on Jul 21, 09 01:39PMHello Notties,
I am one of those who bought into NOT because of the thrilling potential of Windfall gold.
I personally did not believe that the fantastic gold originally seen in the initial core samples somehow "disappeared "and thus, Windfall was put on "maintenance and repair".
NOT seems to be focused exclusively on Nickel now at the Eagles, which is a great thing. I am as excited about this as I was about Windfall. However, I do think that we are entitled to more transparency, and entitled to that Windfall report that was promised to us this month.
Of course, we can buy EAG to participate in Windfall, but it's principle we're talking here. Shouldn't shareholders have been told a bit more? Windfall was a big thing!
My eyes and hopes are on the Eagles. I'm certain they're going to soar brilliantly, and bring us great blessing! I just want Wes and colleagues to reveal all the facts about this Windfall deal. He's stated that he wants to be more inclusive andI want to be able to trust him.
Oh, it is finally getting very exciting..
Jacki