Snow Man Theory in Tonnage / rumour not fact. take it offtopic

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Burnhard83

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 2719 [?]

Votes: 157 Score: 3.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Snow Man Theory in Tonnage / rumour not fact. take it offtopic

in response to

Re: Snow Man Theory in Tonnage

QQ_Girl

posted on Aug 21, 2009 09:34AM

Great to see the reports of the Luncheon. Good to see people contributing. All opinions welcome...

The Snowman theory, is nice, but we should take it off topic for now. Its rumour, not based on fact. Unless I see more evidence (based on other known deposits) that this rumour/theory is real, it really means nothing. For all I know you could be using Fibonnacci ratios or the golden rule to support your Snowman theory. It doesn't matter. GET EVIDENCE. Surely by now we know that throwing figures/numbers into the ring based on nothing is worthless here, besides influencing a small group of emotional shareholders who don't think properly.

Ok, I think you get the point. Not bashing, just asking for better arguments.

Kind regards,

Bernhard

7 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply