Re: Weighing in on "potential" size of a snowman, Those who want facts, read NR's
posted on
Aug 21, 2009 11:28PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Mucker You said:
"We can all hope the lenses get bigger at depth,but if were going to dream, we better dream for much higer grade at depth."
Mucker, you did read the recent assay results on hole 49 right? Just in case you did not or forgot, here is the dream that grades are getting better at depth:
Eagle 1B (the first lens) located vertically under Eagle 1A returned;
and
Eagle 1C (the second lens) also located vertically under Eagle 1A and directly under Eagle 1B returned;
In case you missed a previous post of mine, I stated as a fact that hole 49 collasped in mineralization. (again, from a credible source)
The truth machine will ultimately trump all speculation but I am very comfortable watching the developments with my rosy NOT glasses.
Nuff said.
Milsy1