HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Hole 49-58
31
Aug 28, 2009 11:17AM
26
Aug 28, 2009 11:32AM
8
Aug 28, 2009 11:39AM
16
Aug 28, 2009 11:52AM
8
Aug 28, 2009 11:59AM
18
Aug 28, 2009 01:29PM
2
Aug 28, 2009 05:40PM
16
Aug 29, 2009 09:35AM
21
Aug 29, 2009 11:14AM

Sum, I would respectfully disagree with your assessment of Mousers post. Appears to me he is basically asking why NOT is keeping the location of holes 50-58 (in his post, #51) so secret. I think many NOT investors would like NOT to be more transparent forthcoming and give investors the location of these drill holes. Why are they holding it back. How are they hurt by disclosing it. He isnt asking for results, just the location of the hole, which to this point as far as I know, has not been disclosed. Then he gives a speculative reason as to possibly why it is being withheld, which to me is just fine as its basd on solid analytical reasoning.

If that question has been aswered on this forum previously, then please accept my apologies. But I havent found it anywhere on NOT website, nor seen any definitive postings on it.

I feel that his asking this question is legitimate and reasonable and that Mouser should not be belittled for having asked it.

2
Aug 29, 2009 01:57PM
10
Aug 29, 2009 02:41PM
9
Aug 29, 2009 03:22PM
3
Aug 29, 2009 05:55PM
3
Aug 29, 2009 06:06PM
9
Aug 29, 2009 06:10PM
3
Aug 29, 2009 06:43PM
12
Aug 29, 2009 08:00PM
19
Aug 29, 2009 08:27PM
3
Aug 29, 2009 09:06PM
37
Aug 30, 2009 09:27AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply