I think that a raging dialogue on this forum about the silent generosity of our disposed Co-CEO’s, followed by a direct query during the Q&A regarding BoD approval of this unearned (and therefore theft) of company funds, is justified.

We could arm a retail representative with our votes in order to get some respect and send a big message. "Wes should know that we consider this excessive and unethical when the value these clowns contributed to NOT is considered".

I for one am pleased that the Co-CEO clown show is over and that Wes is actually working for NOT. If it cost us a couple of million to ditch the parasites – so be it.

Somehow we must get the message to Wes that this is past tense and not a precedent.