HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: ...obg- Exactly The Response I Expected...Which Is Part Of The Problem
26
Oct 22, 2009 07:57AM
22
Oct 22, 2009 08:30AM

Hi, Columbo-

I think that you are misinterpreting the frustration that is felt in that it's all the "old posters" who did their DD and shared it on the board, for the benefit of others. They put in a *ton* of thought and legwork, and it's a bit frustrating to have newbies appearing and asking the most basic questions and/or vociferously opining in what appears to be almost complete ignorance. It's painful to see and could be interpreted as being disrespectful.

Rather than being impatient and asking whatever comes to mind, it would help newcomers' understanding and help prevent board clutter if newbies would please read the items in the "Due Diligence" section under the "Link Library" in the middle of the left-hand panel first. Consider it a fundamental part of *your* DD.

Remember, "those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it"!

Presidents- Perhaps a FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) section could be added to the DD section? It might help newcomers (and old-timers). Adding a link off the Discussion Forum page to the FAQ (similar to the "President's DD" link) would make that more apparent, too.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply