HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Cliffs?(correction to rapidrob reply to geoprof)
56
Oct 30, 2009 07:38PM
29
Oct 30, 2009 09:56PM
45
Oct 31, 2009 04:37AM
6
Oct 31, 2009 10:20AM
12
Oct 31, 2009 11:47AM
23
Oct 31, 2009 12:26PM
23
Oct 31, 2009 01:47PM
30
Oct 31, 2009 02:55PM
14
Oct 31, 2009 03:49PM
3
Oct 31, 2009 04:18PM
19
Oct 31, 2009 05:23PM

Re: Cliffs?(correction to rapidrob reply to geoprof)

in response to by
posted on Oct 31, 2009 06:01PM

My apologies for not picking up this posting error. In the last sentence of the second paragraph it CLF and NOT were reversed, it is CLF that would have shot itself in the foot by not attemting to secure FWR at a lower level if the combined a combined FWR/NOT were to trade higher than current levels.

13
Oct 31, 2009 07:40PM
12
Oct 31, 2009 08:06PM
7
Oct 31, 2009 08:19PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply