Re: A four bagger

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

superspeeder

Rank: Treasurer [?]

Points: 994 [?]

Votes: 114 Score: 2.8 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: A four bagger

in response to

A four bagger

Stratopod

posted on Dec 01, 2009 08:39AM

Good point, Strato, but FWR share owners tendering to the NOT bid still have the opportunity to have a bagger with their newly acquired NOT shares after realising a bagger with the FWR shares they tendered to get them.

IMO, it is NOT's future potential that makes their offer so much better than Cliffs' offer.

How about this; FWR shareholders get a three bagger on their FWR shares, then a four bagger on their new NOT shares... 3x4=12. I like that math!

17 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply