HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Guess The % Chance Of NOT's SP Going In The Tank If This Hits The Court System

The issue seems to be that that the FWR shareholders who tender will get to vote - even though at the time of the FWR meeting NOT will own the shares. Let's say this remains unchallenged, isn't it basically unjust and therefore should be challenged in court, or by an injunction? (Tell me if my assumption is wrong - I'm ready to stand corrected!).

To predict the effect on NOT's selling price is a mug's game.

Are you saying that NOT should do nothing?

Actually, as things stand the FWR shareholders who tender would all vote against the merger with CLF - but might have to be contacted for their proxies if this is practical, or allowed

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply