HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Update
72
Mar 20, 2010 10:06AM
11
Mar 20, 2010 10:17AM
26
Mar 20, 2010 10:51AM
25
Mar 20, 2010 10:52AM

Re: Update

in response to by
posted on Mar 20, 2010 10:58AM

Hoov, at the risk of missing the point, what might represent a "hostile takeover" to management or control group does not necessarily represent a hostile takeout attempt to the broader shareholder base. There are some obvious and some less obvious reasons for this. Realistically, most investors will consider any significant offer to be a value-adding occurrence for the the obvious reason it incites and accelerates competition to gain control of the resource. For example, FWR did not go for the NOT proposal but were quite happy in the majority with the end result. That is exactly what we as investors would welcome. We can always say no.

2
Mar 20, 2010 11:03AM
11
Mar 20, 2010 11:09AM
2
Mar 20, 2010 11:16AM
4
Mar 20, 2010 11:19AM
9
Mar 20, 2010 11:27AM
8
Mar 20, 2010 11:32AM
7
Mar 20, 2010 11:39AM
2
Mar 20, 2010 11:44AM
27
Mar 20, 2010 12:04PM
19
Mar 20, 2010 12:34PM
10
Mar 20, 2010 12:41PM
3
Mar 20, 2010 12:51PM
13
Mar 20, 2010 12:58PM
6
Mar 20, 2010 01:01PM
20
Mar 20, 2010 01:18PM
18
Mar 20, 2010 01:39PM
30
Mar 20, 2010 01:44PM
5
Mar 20, 2010 01:49PM
12
Mar 20, 2010 02:00PM
5
Mar 20, 2010 02:20PM
15
Mar 20, 2010 03:43PM
17
Mar 20, 2010 04:14PM
5
Mar 20, 2010 05:09PM
9
Mar 20, 2010 06:12PM
5
Mar 20, 2010 06:59PM
11
Mar 20, 2010 09:42PM
38
Mar 20, 2010 10:19PM
6
Mar 20, 2010 10:31PM
33
Mar 20, 2010 10:49PM
59
Mar 20, 2010 10:54PM
40
Mar 20, 2010 11:10PM
6
Mar 21, 2010 12:58AM
13
Mar 21, 2010 01:01AM
15
Mar 21, 2010 01:03AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply