HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: 60 cents
36
Jun 28, 2011 07:55PM
12
Jun 28, 2011 08:17PM
13
Jun 28, 2011 08:19PM
14
Jun 28, 2011 10:27PM
13
Jun 28, 2011 10:50PM
8
Jun 29, 2011 05:37AM
11
Jun 29, 2011 10:37AM

Babjak1,

You alluded to: as resource size/grade of resource/change in spot increases, the PV increases dramatically (partly because fixed costs don't increase for increases in these items).

FYI: In the last feasibility study there were sensitivities to the present value of NOT for things like change in grade of resource/ change in spot price/ change in resource size...Look at the line graphs... You can use these to ballpark value given a different (more current) set of assumptions. You will be suprised how leveraged this calculation is - more grade; more spot price = huge increases in value.

Awhile ago (at the time of the news release), I did a quick calculation using those sensitivities and current information (if i remember correctly the study used average spot rates and some older resource grade estimates). It was awhile ago, but I think my PV was at least 2x what was shown in that feasibility study...

In response to Crazytrade... im not concerned with financing of a mine - this mine will be built by someone other than NOT.

19
Jun 29, 2011 03:02PM
2
Jun 29, 2011 03:45PM
5
Jun 29, 2011 03:55PM
14
Jun 29, 2011 04:20PM
6
Jun 29, 2011 06:54PM
7
Jun 29, 2011 09:45PM
2
Jun 29, 2011 09:50PM
11
Jun 29, 2011 11:16PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply