HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: RAIL vs. ROAD
17
Mar 15, 2013 03:15PM
10
Mar 15, 2013 05:24PM
9
Mar 15, 2013 06:37PM
3
Mar 16, 2013 01:07AM
5
ANL
Mar 16, 2013 01:46AM
3
Mar 16, 2013 01:49AM
5
Mar 16, 2013 06:32AM
2
ANL
Mar 16, 2013 07:33PM
1
Mar 17, 2013 12:54AM

The important aspect is that the transmission line is going in. Whether it is along the road or in the straightest route is secondary. No need to be concerned much about which path. The path for it is determined on what is most expedient cost and service wise.

Even though my background is electric engineering, I have nothing significant to add regarding economics of transmission line path. In other words benefits of shortest path vs easy access by road towards future servicing.
I lean towards path along road because wind and ice damage over the life of the line probably will more than offset the cost saved by shortest path, all just my guessed at opinion.

I also think that because the transmission line is going in, the path must have been already decided. With the decision of the transmission path they must also know that the road is also going in beside it. Ice road access is not likely to be adequate for servicing the line.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply