Re: GCA comments on Ring of Fire right of way decision

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Edgy

Rank: President [?]

Points: 38290 [?]

Votes: 354 Score: 3.3 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: GCA comments on Ring of Fire right of way decision

in response to

Re: GCA comments on Ring of Fire right of way decision

B-Jay

posted on Sep 13, 2013 05:05AM

Am I missing something or another misrepresentation?

General Chairperson’s Association:
"A private, provincially funded $700M + road is in no one’s best interest, least of all taxpayers” said GCA spokesperson Brian Kelly"
All they talk about is a Road.

Did Cliffs apply for the easement ONLY for a road OR did they for a railway with a possible service road? I believe it must have been the latter. I also think that Cliffs would be satisfied if the easement was only for a railway.

Yup, "Someone should work on their PR-writing skills." and tell them to not misrepresent by turning things arround.

( Since when is a mole hill a mountain and a mountain a mole hill, Geez, talk about bias lol.)

4 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply