HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Canada Chrome's Rail Route
21
Oct 24, 2013 04:19AM
11
Oct 24, 2013 10:26AM

Hi Laura,

Okay, I'm looking at the Intierra claim map of the ROF. It's a couple years old at least. But looking at it again, I don't see how the western CCC claims manage to get around that big JV claim block that is JV'd by Temex & KWG. As far as Canterra goes, the western route does at the very least run beside the Canterra Rainy Mtn claims, south of the ROF. The Temex-BMK JV surrounds the CCC claims as it enters the the ROF from the south according to this map.

I do not have any claim numbers on this map and without the actual proposed rail route, I cannot confirm anything. Just saying what it appears to be on the Intierra claim map.

Perhaps, if it's available somewhere, someone could post the CCC claim map on here. I looked on KWG's and could not find it. I'd like to know for sure whose claims may also affected by the proposed rail route, whether it's built or not.

Laura, I was by no means in any way, defending Cliffs or Bill Boors position. Just trying to figure out why Boors said they'd have to deal with a number of companies.

respectfully,

strato

7
Oct 24, 2013 11:16AM
8
Oct 24, 2013 11:39AM
9
Oct 24, 2013 12:35PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply