Agoracom: Small Cap Investment - POET Technologies Inc. - Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

Poet large

Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free

Reply New Message

Back To Forum List View

POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

16

ChristopherChuIR

Sep 12, 2013 02:00PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

2

Sep 12, 2013 02:07PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 02:15PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

Sep 12, 2013 02:15PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

3

ChristopherChuIR

Sep 12, 2013 02:22PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

Sep 12, 2013 02:26PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

1

Sep 12, 2013 02:26PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

Sep 12, 2013 02:33PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

2

Sep 12, 2013 03:02PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

1

Sep 12, 2013 03:55PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 04:23PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 04:32PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

6

Sep 12, 2013 04:42PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 04:53PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

6

Sep 12, 2013 05:01PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

3

Sep 12, 2013 05:06PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

3

Sep 12, 2013 05:15PM

wanttoretireearly

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 2989 [?]

Votes: 127 Score: 3.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

in response to

POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

by

ChristopherChuIR

posted on Sep 12, 2013 05:17PM

Log in to use the IP Check tool ^[?]

Thanks Christopher and Peter.

Intel is silicon and that is it, no more no less. POET is more than Intel and we all know what POET can do, it can do both (elec. and light).

Let Intel go to 14nm, let them go to 10nm or even 7nm, it does not matter because it's only a silicon and it can only go so far. Yeah, silicon might not be dead yet but for sure is dying and grasping for the last breath. You can read in Intels articles that they (Intel) is fighting but it's finghting a lost game.

I hope WIN or some other company gets POET than Intel. (the bigger they are the harder they fall, and it goes for everything in this world and that's a univers's law).

cheers

1 Recommendations

Loading...

Loading...

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

1

Sep 12, 2013 05:20PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

Sep 12, 2013 05:28PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

3

Sep 12, 2013 05:28PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

3

Sep 12, 2013 05:35PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

2

Sep 12, 2013 05:51PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 06:06PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

2

Sep 12, 2013 06:11PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 06:29PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

3

Sep 12, 2013 06:33PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

3

Sep 12, 2013 06:44PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 07:04PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 07:05PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 07:07PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 07:09PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

1

Sep 12, 2013 07:49PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

2

Sep 12, 2013 07:56PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 08:06PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

2

Sep 12, 2013 08:09PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

2

Sep 12, 2013 08:09PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

1

Sep 12, 2013 08:19PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 08:30PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

1

Sep 12, 2013 08:37PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

1

Sep 12, 2013 08:40PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

2

Sep 12, 2013 08:42PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

1

Sep 12, 2013 08:45PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

3

Sep 12, 2013 09:15PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

4

Sep 12, 2013 09:20PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

2

Sep 12, 2013 09:40PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

2

Sep 12, 2013 09:45PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

8

Sep 12, 2013 10:09PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

1

Sep 12, 2013 10:25PM

Re: POET Response to: “Intel statement at IDF13 that Moore’s Law is not dead..."

Sep 13, 2013 10:56AM

Reply New Message

Back To Forum List View

Share

Share

Share

Please to post a reply