Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Re: POET publishing Pellegrino – or not
6
Jun 16, 2014 09:42AM

Jun 16, 2014 09:50AM
1
Jun 16, 2014 09:52AM
7
Jun 16, 2014 10:03AM
34
Jun 16, 2014 10:18AM
9
Jun 16, 2014 10:36AM

Jun 16, 2014 10:36AM

Jun 16, 2014 10:40AM

Jun 16, 2014 10:40AM
1
Jun 16, 2014 10:41AM

Jun 16, 2014 10:43AM
10
Jun 16, 2014 10:47AM
2
Jun 16, 2014 10:52AM
8
Jun 16, 2014 10:54AM
2
Jun 16, 2014 10:57AM
2
Jun 16, 2014 10:59AM
2
Jun 16, 2014 11:00AM
6
Jun 16, 2014 11:05AM
5
Jun 16, 2014 11:13AM
6
Jun 16, 2014 11:19AM
1
Jun 16, 2014 11:24AM
9
Jun 16, 2014 11:31AM
5
Jun 16, 2014 11:32AM

Jun 16, 2014 11:34AM
11
Jun 16, 2014 02:52PM

Leafs 67

I am not sure how many you speak for Leafs 67 just that you don't speak for me, thank you very much.

I think this Board could be a much healthier place if it allowed for pertinent and valid observations and questions. I think if a member is making statements either positive or negative then others have the right to further queary or ask for supportive documentation.

This is an investment board and as such all statements/questions, positive, neutral or negative should have the same rights as long as they are pertinent to the investment in question and that is POET.

The investor should be taking in all known and available information and observations about said investment in order to qualify the risk of his or her investment and satisfy their tolerances.

The questions and observations that have been posted that many seem to find negative have in large part been quite valid, in my opinion.

Those questions should be treated withg respect and answered by those they are directed to.

Again, just my opinion

6
Jun 16, 2014 05:05PM
4
Jun 16, 2014 06:09PM
16
Jun 16, 2014 06:17PM
13
Jun 16, 2014 07:28PM
9
Jun 17, 2014 01:07AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply