Scary,

We all appreciated the long discourse you posted some time ago regarding your unfortunate position. WHilst I respect that you and others like johnyreb whose POET experience and finances are affected by the timing and delays of POET development, calling out Peter Copetti as responsible for this is ignoring the multi faceted and changing nature of the environment in which POET developments takes place. His timings were out but are explainable in the context of the changes that are occuring. Surely you can see there is a need for flexibilty and different reaction to changing circumstances.

You invested in a Venture capital project containing a high level of risk, Like us all we hoped for earlier outcomes but to blame PC for the serendipidy of a high risk Venture that has not worked to your timescale has an air of sour grapes about it.

To say any one could have done what he has done denies PC his unrelenting energy to make a success of this project. Not many have that zeal and energy. I think the history of POET will see him as a knight in shining armour. His flaws are over enthusiam but he more than others has triend to engage with shareholders personally, his message recently via Chris was an example of that.

The board approves NR and they must take corporate responsibilty if sharehoders needs are not met, the company could always do more but too much communications would give the impression of a snake oil company.

Please don't let sour gapes demeans your normaly well considered Posts it does not become you.

sula