Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Re: speed
5
May 18, 2016 12:58PM
16
May 18, 2016 01:16PM
2
May 18, 2016 01:29PM

May 18, 2016 01:46PM
2
May 18, 2016 02:04PM

Urgh.. lol Ark88.. for all the energy some people put into posting endless ramblings, you'd think they'd have a clue of what they're talking about..

...

This was the most fustrating part of the THM for me. This question was misunderstood by both parties, although Suresh did answer correctly, I get the feeling Suresh is too smart to answer a "dumb question" so to speak.

As in Suresh makes a better scientist than a salesman.

...

They are talking about two very different companies(vision)

In the old days(remember 2-5years ago) POET was talking about a speed advantage at the "computer chip level"(simplified term), it was stated "speed increase DEPENDING ON APPLICATION".

If POET were to be applied at the processor level, ie: chip in you phone/computer/server, then yes there would be a theoretical speed increase, as the electrons used to make the 1's and 0's in the chip move faster in a GaAs substrate compared to Silicon.

The present POET is focused on optical engines where speed is irrelevant in that sense of measurement.

...

So it's simple really, POET is not talking about "processors" anymore, ie: 40nm chips.

They are a company focused on optical engines, where that metric no longer applies in that sense.

That's why we finaly saw an update to our outdated sales pitch.

...

10G/40G/100G, they are all standards.

Just like the 120 volts in your home wall power plugs, just because you can shove 500 volts in there, doesn't mean people want that.. but where this example differs, yes eventually in the future, everything will have speeds over 10G/40G etc, new baselines will be in the 50Gs & 100Gs etc.. but hold your boots, that's going to take a while.

6
May 18, 2016 02:58PM
2
May 18, 2016 03:13PM
8
May 18, 2016 03:17PM
11
PTK
May 18, 2016 03:36PM
7
May 18, 2016 03:53PM
4
PTK
May 18, 2016 03:54PM
6
May 18, 2016 04:05PM

PTK
May 18, 2016 04:10PM
5
May 18, 2016 04:16PM
71
May 18, 2016 04:26PM
23
May 18, 2016 04:43PM
22
May 18, 2016 04:44PM
4
PTK
May 18, 2016 04:50PM
9
May 18, 2016 04:52PM
4
PTK
May 18, 2016 04:55PM
6
May 18, 2016 05:08PM
6
May 18, 2016 05:17PM
39
May 18, 2016 08:25PM
19
May 18, 2016 09:11PM
18
May 18, 2016 09:35PM
18
May 18, 2016 10:05PM
3
May 19, 2016 05:45AM
35
May 19, 2016 07:06AM
9
May 19, 2016 07:14AM
20
May 19, 2016 08:04AM
2
May 19, 2016 08:07AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply