Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Re: speed
5
May 18, 2016 12:58PM
16
May 18, 2016 01:16PM
2
May 18, 2016 01:29PM

May 18, 2016 01:46PM
2
May 18, 2016 02:04PM
45
May 18, 2016 02:48PM
6
May 18, 2016 02:58PM
2
May 18, 2016 03:13PM
8
May 18, 2016 03:17PM
11
PTK
May 18, 2016 03:36PM
7
May 18, 2016 03:53PM
4
PTK
May 18, 2016 03:54PM
6
May 18, 2016 04:05PM

PTK
May 18, 2016 04:10PM
5
May 18, 2016 04:16PM
71
May 18, 2016 04:26PM
23
May 18, 2016 04:43PM
22
May 18, 2016 04:44PM
4
PTK
May 18, 2016 04:50PM
9
May 18, 2016 04:52PM
4
PTK
May 18, 2016 04:55PM
6
May 18, 2016 05:08PM
6
May 18, 2016 05:17PM
39
May 18, 2016 08:25PM
19
May 18, 2016 09:11PM
18
May 18, 2016 09:35PM
18
May 18, 2016 10:05PM
3
May 19, 2016 05:45AM

Jammingthepipeline: Sometimes I wonder if management has a clue about the market.

Sometimes I wonder why management should care about the market. I for one want management to execute, execute, execute. If it cared about the market, it couldn't focus on execution. And it is execution that creates value, value, value. Nothing else does, except for fake value.

If management cared about the market (aka the share price), they would lean to make short-term decisions, decisions that might support the share price, but turn out to be bad or suboptimal on the long term. And who would want that, except for day traders?

Okay, agreed, management should care about the market, because one day it might have to go to it for a capital raise. What would a prospective investor (unlike a trader) prefer? A company with a proven track record of business successes? Or a company that tries to make traders happy? I know which kind of company I'd prefer!

9
May 19, 2016 07:14AM
20
May 19, 2016 08:04AM
2
May 19, 2016 08:07AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply